You can choose between a number of wooden, leather, and grippy plastic backs to personalize your device. However, the Moto X Pure is more customizable through Moto Maker.
These actually seem like they could be pretty helpful in certain situations, so if any of them appeal to you, you’re going to want to go for the Moto Z over the Moto X Pure.
#HOME BUDGET SOFT APPADDICT MODS#
Known mods include a projector, battery pack, speaker, and covers for the back of the phone, which are thin and even bring the back in line with the camera, thus eliminating the aforementioned camera bump. Rumors have been circulating for months that Apple will do the same, but Lenovo seems to have beaten Apple to the punch. Bluetooth headphones are slowly becoming the norm, and you’ll still be able to use headphones with a USB-C adapter, but it’s still an annoyance.Īnother thing to note is that the Moto Z can get new powers with Moto Mods, of which there will be a few at launch. It’s thin, but only because Lenovo decided to get rid of the headphone jack. There’s an elephant in the room when it comes to the design of the Moto Z. Of course, you can eliminate that problem with a Moto Mod, a proper case, or you can just deal with it. The Moto Z, on the other hand, suffers from serious camera bump syndrome.Īpart from thickness, the Moto Z is very attractive. The metal, unibody design gives it a premium look and feel, however, the back of the device seems far more susceptible to fingerprints. Perhaps the best thing that the Moto X Pure has over the Moto Z is that it doesn’t have a camera bump. It’s a stylish phone, to be sure, but nothing to really write home about. That’s not to say that the Moto X Pure doesn’t have a lot going for it - the device has a similar design to previous Moto phones. The Moto Z is actually one of the thinnest “premium” devices available, so if you’re looking for a sleek and stylish phone, the Moto Z is an excellent choice. Basically, there are fewer storage options for the Moto Z, but it starts with more, which should be helpful.ĭesign preference is subjective, but there are a few interesting things to note about these two devices. Both of the phones come in either a 32GB or 64GB configuration, however the Moto X Pure also comes with a 16GB option. When it comes to storage, however, the Moto Z isn’t really all that much better. The extra RAM will help during processor intensive tasks like gaming. The device also comes couple with a 4GB of RAM, whereas the Moto X Pure only offers 3GB. If you’re an app addict, you’re going to want to go for the Moto Z. What does that mean in the real world? Apps will load faster, the phone will be more responsive, and it will last longer as apps become more processor-hungry.
#HOME BUDGET SOFT APPADDICT ANDROID#
While the Snapdragon 808 achieved a score of 68,508 from AnTuTu - the Android benchmark used most often– the Snapdragon 820 sits at a cool 136,383. Of course, none of this really matters - all that matters is performance. The Snapdragon 810, for example, suffered from heating issues, something that also prompted LG to opt for the 808 instead of the 810 in the G4.
There are a number of possible reasons for this. While the Moto Z comes outfitted with this year’s Qualcomm flagship processor, the Snapdragon 820, the Moto Z Pure opted for a Snapdragon 808 rather than last year’s equivalent. Just how much better, however, is debatable. Let’s make something clear from the outset - the Lenovo Moto Z is obviously a better phone.
0 kommentar(er)
